On a Sunday morning appearance on ?Fox & Friends,??conservative columnist Ann?Coulter explained why Romney fell short in the South Carolina GOP presidential primary, blaming the priorities of South Carolina voters for Gingrich?s success.
?Apparently, South Carolinians would rather have the emotional satisfaction of a snotty remark toward the president than to beat Obama in the fall,? Coulter, the author of ?Demonic: How the Liberal Mob Is Endangering America,??said. ?We saw it in the debates when Gingrich would say things that didn?t really make sense. That is what you usually associate with Democrats, which I described in my last book, ?Demonic,? how mobs behave.?
Some of what Gingrich has said might appear to make sense, she said, but should be analyzed more closely.
?Something that sounds like it makes sense like, ?Mitt Romney doesn?t have influence over his super PAC ? that makes you wonder if he?ll have influence as president,???she continued. ?How many times does Mitt Romney have to say it is illegal for a candidate to have influence on the super PAC. It is not, interestingly, though, for a president to have influence. So it makes no sense if you think about it for all of three seconds, but it sounds like it makes sense. It is just like what you get from liberals most of the time and the cheers and yahoos, and that is what we kept getting from this audience.?
Coulter, who has been a Romney supporter since New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said he would not be seeking the Republican nomination,?was asked if Romney should change his strategy now that he suffered a defeat in South Carolina, and perhaps go on the offensive with ?fire in the belly.? (RELATED:?Christie on Gingrich?s past: ?Newt Gingrich has embarrassed the party? [VIDEO])
?No, he?s doing fine,? Coulter said. ?This is not going be the electorate in the fall. I am pretty sure we?ll get everyone who voted for McCain ? since no one voted for McCain because we liked McCain ? it was to stop Obama. We have those voters. Now you have to get people who voted for Obama and having a candidate who goes out and calls Obama a Kenyan colonialist, that is not what you need. And at the same time, with Newt Gingrich you get the name calling for the president ? very popular with the tea party crowd and South Carolina, not so popular with independents. He won?t put a fence on the border but wants amnesty for illegals. He took $1.6 million from Freddie Mac. But you know, he attacked Paul Ryan?s plan on Social Security. So with Newt Gingrich, you throw out the baby and keep the bath water.?
Coulter suggested that South Carolina voters ignoring Gingrich?s marriage baggage was the product of the state perhaps ?going back to its Democratic roots.?
?I think South Carolina is going back to its Democratic roots,? she said. ?I mean, to not care about that, that?s the position of the Democratic Party. The arguments I hear on behalf of Gingrich on this is we heard for two solid years about Bill Clinton. I never thought I would hear conservative make those arguments. I promise you, if Mitt Romney or Rick Santorum have cheated on two wives, that we know ? the open marriage thing is the only thing he contests. We know he cheated on two wives. I wouldn?t supporting Mitt Romney. I wouldn?t support Rick Santorum.?
Follow Jeff on Twitter Join the conversation
Read more stories from The Daily Caller
Coulter: 'With Newt Gingrich you throw out the baby and keep the bath water' [VIDEO]
Kochs push back against Obama attack
Christie on Gingrich's past: 'Newt Gingrich has embarrassed the party' [VIDEO]
Romney: I keep my promises (unlike the other guy)
Romney to release tax returns on Tuesday [VIDEO]
social security increase menagerie columbus dispatch social security social security adderall muskingum county
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.