Monday, October 28, 2013

Watch: Britney Spears Recites The Monologue From ‘Thriller’ On BBC Radio 1



Happy Halloween-ny!





Folks … I am about to share with you THE greatest Hallowe’en video of all time, possibly the greatest video of any kind of all time. Our dear Britney Spears paid a visit to BBC Radio 1 when she was in London, England a couple of weeks ago and she teamed up with Nick Grimshaw to produce the absolutely BEST thing you’ll see all day (or all LIFE). In grand dramatic fashion, Britney recites the spoken monologue from Michael Jackson‘s Thriller as a Hallowe’en gift to mankind. Epic doesn’t even come close to describing how life-changing this video is … from beginning to end. It’s Britney, Witch! Click the embed above to have your life altered forever for the better by watching this flawless Hallowe’en video from Britney to you!





Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/pinkisthenewblog/~3/sJ9Sh2duoTk/watch-britney-spears-recites-the-monologue-from-thriller-on-bbc-radio-1
Related Topics: Emmys 2013   eagles   sons of anarchy   bruno mars   Michael Ansara  

10 Novels to a Better You

Illustration by Charlie Powell.

Illustration by Charlie Powell








Does reading fiction make you a better, less self-absorbed person? You read because you are interested in the broad sweep of human experience, and because you want to gain access into the narrow sanctum of specific otherness—to feel Anna Karenina’s recklessness and desperation, or know the shape and weight of Ahab’s obsession, and thereby something of humanity itself. But in order to make any headway with a novel, you need to grant yourself a leave of absence from human affairs, to sequester yourself in a place where you are sheltered from the demanding presence of other people. Opening a novel might be a kind of exposure to the world beyond the self, but it’s one that necessarily involves a foreclosure against it too. A life spent reading is, among other things, a life spent alone.














The idea that reading is an ethically salutary pursuit gets more appealing the more time you spend doing it. There’s something basically reassuring about the notion that you might be a better person—not just intellectually, but morally—for having read a lot of literature. I’ve just recently moved house, a large part of which undertaking involved the handling and sorting and packing and schlepping of books. As I took the books off the shelves and put them into cardboard boxes—and again as I took them out of those boxes and put them back on shelves in a different house—I found myself thinking about what all the time spent reading them added up to. A lot of these books I’ve forgotten almost everything about; all that is left to me of Oblomov, say, is a chubby Russian aristocrat in a dressing gown (was he even actually chubby?), and basically all I remember of Don DeLillo’s Libra is that it was about Lee Harvey Oswald and that it was brilliant. I found myself trying to quantify the residue of all this reading; what was it that it left behind, and how had it changed me, if at all? There was, surely, some cumulative effect, some way in which I could be said to be a better or wiser person for it. But all I could think, really, was: Christ, if all this reading has made me a better or wiser person, I’d hate to think what kind of monster I’d be without it.










Earlier this month, a research paper was published in the journal Science which put forward evidence that social skills are improved by the reading of fiction—and specifically the high-end stuff: the 19th-century Russians, the European modernists, the contemporary prestige names. The experiment, conducted by psychologists Emanuele Castano and David Comer Kidd, found that the subjects who read extracts from literary novels, and then immediately afterward took tests measuring empathy, social perception, and emotional intelligence (looking at photos of people’s eyes and guessing what emotions they might be going through), performed significantly better on the tests than other subjects who read serious nonfiction or genre fiction. Their basic finding was that reading literary fiction, and literary fiction alone, temporarily enhances what’s known as Theory of Mind—the ability to imagine and understand the mental states of others.












The reaction to this was widespread and, as you’d expect, overwhelmingly pleased. Louise Erdrich, whose novel The Round House was used as an example of literary fiction in the experiment, was quoted in the New York Times’ report on the research. “This is why I love science,” she said; the psychologists had “found a way to prove true the intangible benefits of literary fiction.” Finally, science has given its approval to one of the literary world’s most cherished ideas about the value of literature. Even though the study only measured extremely short-term benefits of exposure to small amounts of literary fiction, it was largely taken to stand for a wider truth about the morally improving effects of the stuff, the notion that it makes you a better, more empathic person.










And this, obviously, is nothing new. Although the novel has, throughout its history, often been subject to a kind of self-reflexively ironic anxiety about the dangers of excessive investment in fiction (see Don Quixote, Northanger Abbey, and poor old Emma Bovary for further details), the consensus among writers has generally been that imagining ourselves into fictional minds and lives is something that increases our moral faculties—a practice that grows our capacity for empathic engagement with the minds and lives of actually existing other humans. Our modern concept of empathy comes from the German term einfühlung, which means “feeling into,” and it makes sense that we would associate this quality with the literary capacities of affective projection.


















Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2013/10/does_reading_fiction_make_you_a_more_empathic_better_person.html
Related Topics: time change   steve bartman   legend of korra   iPhone 5S   olinguito  

The Chemistry of Fear: A new video from the American Chemical Society

The Chemistry of Fear: A new video from the American Chemical Society


[ Back to EurekAlert! ]

PUBLIC RELEASE DATE:

28-Oct-2013



[


| E-mail

]


Share Share

Contact: Michael Bernstein
m_bernstein@acs.org
202-872-6042
American Chemical Society





With Halloween just a few days away, millions are flocking to horror films and haunted houses for their annual dose of terror. The latest video from the American Chemical Society's (ACS) Bytesize Science series uncovers the chemistry behind the spine-tingling sense of fear. The episode is available now at http://www.BytesizeScience.com.


"Fear is the expectation or the anticipation of possible harm We know that the body is highly sensitive to the possibility of threat, so there are multiple pathways that bring that fear information into the brain," explains Abigail Marsh, Ph.D., associate professor of psychology at Georgetown University. Marsh's research focuses on the neuroscience of fear and empathy in psychopaths, among other topics. In the video, she highlights the key brain chemicals and hormones involved in fear and the accompanying fight or flight response.


Marsh explains that the amygdala, an evolutionarily ancient part of the human brain, is the most important structure in the fear response. In a bonus video also available at http://www.BytesizeScience.com, Marsh tells the story of "SM," a woman without a functional amygdala who is quite literally fearless.


###

Subscribe to Bytesize Science on YouTube for more videos that uncover the chemistry in everyday life.


The American Chemical Society is a nonprofit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress. With more than 163,000 members, ACS is the world's largest scientific society and a global leader in providing access to chemistry-related research through its multiple databases, peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. Its main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.


To automatically receive news releases from the American Chemical Society, contact newsroom@acs.org.



Follow us: Twitter Facebook



[ Back to EurekAlert! ]

[


| E-mail


Share Share

]

 


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.




The Chemistry of Fear: A new video from the American Chemical Society


[ Back to EurekAlert! ]

PUBLIC RELEASE DATE:

28-Oct-2013



[


| E-mail

]


Share Share

Contact: Michael Bernstein
m_bernstein@acs.org
202-872-6042
American Chemical Society





With Halloween just a few days away, millions are flocking to horror films and haunted houses for their annual dose of terror. The latest video from the American Chemical Society's (ACS) Bytesize Science series uncovers the chemistry behind the spine-tingling sense of fear. The episode is available now at http://www.BytesizeScience.com.


"Fear is the expectation or the anticipation of possible harm We know that the body is highly sensitive to the possibility of threat, so there are multiple pathways that bring that fear information into the brain," explains Abigail Marsh, Ph.D., associate professor of psychology at Georgetown University. Marsh's research focuses on the neuroscience of fear and empathy in psychopaths, among other topics. In the video, she highlights the key brain chemicals and hormones involved in fear and the accompanying fight or flight response.


Marsh explains that the amygdala, an evolutionarily ancient part of the human brain, is the most important structure in the fear response. In a bonus video also available at http://www.BytesizeScience.com, Marsh tells the story of "SM," a woman without a functional amygdala who is quite literally fearless.


###

Subscribe to Bytesize Science on YouTube for more videos that uncover the chemistry in everyday life.


The American Chemical Society is a nonprofit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress. With more than 163,000 members, ACS is the world's largest scientific society and a global leader in providing access to chemistry-related research through its multiple databases, peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. Its main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.


To automatically receive news releases from the American Chemical Society, contact newsroom@acs.org.



Follow us: Twitter Facebook



[ Back to EurekAlert! ]

[


| E-mail


Share Share

]

 


AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert! system.




Source: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2013-10/acs-tco102813.php
Related Topics: Lady Gaga Vma  

Why USB Ports Could Be the Power Outlets of the (Very Near) Future

Why USB Ports Could Be the Power Outlets of the (Very Near) Future

There's a lot to love about USB. The plugs are small and convenient. The cable can carry both power and data. Plus, USB is, well, universal. This is why USB is considered by some to be the future of electricity. Smart grids, more convenient storage, solar power—according to a new Economist report it's all easier with USB.

Read more...


    






Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/SpPOGg2ZVqo/why-usb-ports-could-be-the-power-outlets-of-the-very-n-1450713482
Related Topics: Giraffe   jennifer lawrence   zach mettenberger   9news   9/11 Memorial  

Death Becomes Whimsical On Dia De Los Muertos

[unable to retrieve full-text content]The Mexican Day of the Dead holiday is a time to remember the dead and prepare for their visit. It's also a time for food and friends. With Dia de los Muertos just around the corner, learn how to make a pumpkin and ancho chile mole and the traditional dessert bread, pan de muerto.Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/NprProgramsATC/~3/EjDLuwsYHDs/death-becomes-whimsical-on-dia-de-los-muertos
Related Topics: Walking Dead Season 4   mlb   tupac   Mary Lambert   new iphone  

Last Vegas: Film Review


Star power counts for a helluva lot in Last Vegas, an amiable geezers comedy with an affecting emotional anchor. To call this the geriatric Hangover is both accurate and misleading, as the main fun here is not so much the broad humor as it is to watch five great old pros — Michael Douglas, Robert De Niro, Morgan Freeman, Kevin Kline and an entirely captivating Mary Steenburgen — imparting pleasure while obviously having it themselves. Although formulaic in design and programmed to meet its quota of laughs, the film makes a point of going beyond basic expectations into some legitimate aspects of mature friendships without getting soggy about it. CBS Films looks to make this visit to Vegas a profitable one.



All wearing their years quite well, thank you — Freeman is the oldest at 76, Kline the youngest at 66, while De Niro is 70 and Douglas 69 — the actors play friends who have known each other for nearly six decades, as glimpsed in a Brooklyn childhood prologue. Nowadays, Archie (Freeman) is a veteran of one stroke whose obsessively protective son holds him health hostage in his New Jersey home, Sam (Kline) is bored in early Florida retirement with his longtime spouse and Paddy (De Niro) no longer leaves his New York apartment after his beloved wife's death.


PHOTOS: 19 Action Stars Kicking Butt Past 50


By extreme contrast, ladies' man and successful Malibu attorney Billy (Douglas) willfully ignores the calendar but finally decides it's time to settle down — with a bride about a third his age. Despite reluctance on the part of Paddy, who says he hates Billy, the guys agree to meet in Vegas for a bachelor party on the Saturday night before Billy's Sunday wedding.


Screenwriter Dan Fogelman (Crazy, Stupid, Love.) delivers the requisite amount of old-age shtick (Sam's wife thoughtfully slips him an envelope containing a Viagra pill and a condom in the hope that some action will revitalize her husband), but quickly takes the story in a refreshingly unexpected direction with the introduction of Diana (Steenburgen), a wise and sassy lounge singer who's very frank about her availability as well as about the hope that Vegas will provide her with a satisfying next act to her life. She teases and engages with the guys, her sultry singing style is wonderful and develops a quick rapport with both Paddy and Billy that inadvertently revives the secret grudge that drove a wedge between them.


For his part, Sam attracts the attention of a drag queen (Roger Bart), while Archie's big winnings at blackjack occasion an upgrade into the hotel's most lavish suite, available now that 50 Cent has canceled for the weekend. Events naturally conspire for the boys to to use the enormous space to throw a wild party, in the course of which Archie shows off some smooth dance moves, Sam is forced to decide whether or not to use his wife's presents, and 50 Cent, in a cameo, shows up after all to demand that the music be turned down.


Director Jon Turteltaub's signal accomplishment here is to have created a congenial environment in which the actors could bond and have fun within proper boundaries. The foursome's approach to these uncomplicated characters is at once relaxed and alert, loose and quick on their toes; they're just darn good company for a couple of hours, both when they're rejecting the usual expectations to act their age but especially when they're working through emotional issues for which even decades of experience provide inadequate preparation.


In every instance, the long-buried feelings that fire the dynamics of the men's character arcs cut rewardingly across the sitcommy ways the guys are initially presented: Cranky stay-at-home Paddy evolves into a man afflicted with profound romantic angst; Archie's life-loving bonhomie asserts itself once he escapes his son's overbearing surveillance; Sam reverses course from premature calcification to libidinous reawakening, while Billy risks renewed conflict with Paddy to at long last look beyond a woman's surface charms and probe the potential of a mature romantic relationship. These may be obvious trajectories but they serve to invest a farcical context with plausible facsimiles of real people.


VIDEO: 'Last Vegas' Trailer: Morgan Freeman, Robert De Niro Plan Their Own 'Hangover'


The actors are all great to watch. It may be that Freeman's work stands out simply because, since he's now most often cast in solemn, grave, not to say God-like roles, he hasn't cut loose like this in a long time; like his character, he should do it more often. At first it seems that Douglas as an L.A. playboy is just too obvious, but the sensitivity and soul that Diana ushers to the surface as Billy spends more time with her elicits many grace notes from the actor. While Kline's role could have benefited from more meat in the script, his impeccable timing makes you pine for more mature serio-comic roles for this acting wizard. De Niro morphs his stubborn Archie Bunker-like complainer into a hurt man with a couple of exceptional grievances.


And then there's Steenburgen's Diana. Her musical gifts draw you in first but her self-deprecating humor, wisdom of the ways of the world and fundamental optimism make her a keeper and deserving of heated competition among men. In her best film role in years, the actress delivers a fully realized character from the outset and deepens it into someone you really care about even in an essentially comic context.


Opens: Nov. 1 (CBS Films)
Production: Laurence Mark Productions
Cast: Michael Douglas, Robert De Niro, Morgan Freeman, Kevin Kline, Mary Steenburgen, Jerry Ferrara, Romany Malco, Roger Bart
Director: Jon Turteltaub
Screenwriter: Dan Fogelman
Producers: Laurence Mark, Amy Baer
Executive producers: Nathan Kahane, Jeremiah Samuels, Lawrence Gray
Director of photography: David Hennings
Production designer: David J. Bomba
Costume designer: Dayna Pink
Editor: David Rennie
Music: Mark Mothersbaugh
PG-13 rating, 104 minutes


Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thr/news/~3/NM40bsdE48c/651139
Related Topics: apple   ann coulter   mrsa   furlough   aaron hernandez  

INSIGHT: Water, wealth and whites - S.Africa's potent anti-fracking mix


By Ed Cropley


NIEU-BETHESDA, South Africa (Reuters) - Stretching across the heart of South Africa, the Karoo has stirred emotions for centuries, a stunning semi-desert wilderness that draws artists, hunters and the toughest of farmers.


It is now rousing less romantic passions.


If energy companies and the ruling African National Congress (ANC) get their way, it will soon be home to scientists and geologists mapping out shale gas fields touted as game-changers for Africa's biggest economy, and working out whether fracking will work here.


As with other prospective sites around the world, especially in Europe, the process is meeting significant opposition, some of it thrown up by Mother Nature, some not. The result is likely to be a lengthy delay before any exploration starts.


Fracking, or hydraulic fracturing, involves digging wells up to 4 kilometres (km) deep, then pumping in large amounts of water mixed with chemicals under high pressure to crack the shale rock and release the gas.


Not only does the Karoo have very little water - the mighty Kalahari desert lies just to its north - but the oil companies are up against a well-organised grass-roots lobby opposed to anything that could upset its fragile environment.


Amid the usual array of greens and "not in my back yard" campaigners sits South Africa's richest man, Cartier billionaire Johann Rupert, who is promising to take a legal fight up to the highest court if Pretoria rushes into granting exploration licences.


A lack of proper consultation with landowners over exploration, he and his legal team argue, has already violated property rights enshrined in the constitution.


They also say that a number of "significant unknowns" about fracking and the geology of the Karoo must be answered before any green light can be considered legally sound.


"We do need electricity. I'm not a troglodyte," Rupert, who is worth an estimated $6.6 billion, told Reuters this month after mining minister Susan Shabangu made clear she was keen to give the go-ahead.


"We just want to know that they are doing it in a safe way," he said. "If they do not abide by the law and by the constitution then we'll have to remind them that we do have a constitution."


Pro-fracking activists concede that a lengthy legal fight is inevitable.


"After the licence has been granted, there is going to be legal battle after legal battle after legal battle," said Vuyisile Booysen, chairman of the Karoo Shale Gas Community Forum.


GAS HUNT


The first formal interest in shale gas in the Karoo began in 2008, with an application for exploration rights - as yet ungranted - by Bundu Oil and Gas, a subsidiary of Australia's Challenger Energy.


Shale really made the headlines three years later, when Shell applied for an exploration licence covering more than 95,000 square kilometres, almost a quarter of the Karoo.


An outcry from farmers and landowners including Rupert ensued, prompting the government to freeze all new and existing applications while it assessed the risks and rewards of allowing exploration and ultimately production to go ahead.


During that time, the pro-fracking lobby, led by Shell, has laid out its stall.


Its key argument is that technically recoverable gas reserves, estimated by the U.S. Energy Information Administration at 390 trillion cubic feet (tcf), could transform an economy that has always been a big oil and gas importer.


The estimate gives South Africa the world's eighth biggest shale reserves, with nearly two-thirds the deposits estimated in the United States.


A Shell-commissioned study by Cape Town-based consultancy Econometrix suggests extracting 50 tcf, or 12.8 percent of potential reserves, would add $20 billion or 0.5 percent of GDP to the economy every year for 25 years and create 700,000 jobs.


With an election in six months, that argument has gained traction, especially as the ruling ANC is struggling to come up with answers for the millions of impoverished black citizens for whom life has changed little in the two decades since apartheid.


"By embarking on this process presented by hydraulic fracturing for the production of shale gas, we bring the country a step closer to the achievement of our objectives," Shabangu said this month as revised minerals laws were submitted to parliament.


Shell and its effervescent South African chairman, Bonang Mohale, are convinced their charm offensive will work. He insists Shell will frack safely and with minimum intrusion.


"We will get the licence. You can see the frenetic work the government is doing," Mohale told Reuters. "Why would they go to so much work if the intent is not to properly regulate hydraulic fracturing?"


WHAT ABOUT THE WATER?


However, the fact remains that the Karoo's environment - particularly its water supply - is very fragile, and local suspicion runs high.


In Nieu-Bethesda, a village of 1,500 people some 750 km (470 miles) south of Johannesburg, the only permanent water supply since it was founded by frontiersmen in the mid-1800s has been a spring that wells up from deep within the surrounding mountains.


Any interruption to that spring's flow or quality and the town of Nieu-Bethesda risks dying out, making it an extreme example of the threat to water safety that has sparked concern at fracking sites around the world.


"Shell must stay away from here," said 59-year-old Molly Nikelo, an unemployed grandmother who supplements her meagre monthly state hand-out by cultivating a small plot of rare purple garlic for sale in expensive eateries in Durban.


"What about the water? It supplies everybody and only comes from one place. People drink it, wash in it and grow vegetables with it. I've drunk this water every day of my life and I've never been to hospital."


Emotions are also being stirred by the legacy of white-minority rule that has left a handful of wealthy whites in control of most of South Africa's land, and blacks in dead-end townships waiting for jobs that never arrive.


"It has become a very nasty racial issue," said Samuel Zakay, a church minister who came down against fracking after "considerable thought and prayer".


"People have accused us black ministers of siding with these rich white people," he told Reuters in Graaff-Reinet, a typical Karoo town of quaint, white-washed cottages and Cape Dutch-style buildings with their distinctive rounded gables.


The pro-fracking lobby are adamant that whites are going to have to give some ground for the greater good, but insist they have nothing to fear.


The people against this project are a few wealthy white residents "who fear losing out", according to Booysen, the pro-fracking activist. "But this is not Zimbabwe where you take farms without compensation. And we are also concerned about the environment. I live here as well, you know."


HIGH STAKES


For Shell too, the stakes are high.


Having missed out on the U.S. shale gas revolution, South Africa offers a catch-up play and if it can pull off the technology in the Karoo, the firm will be well-placed to tackle the shale gas lodestone - China.


The world's most populous nation has the biggest estimated reserves, at 1,115 tcf, most of it thought to sit beneath remote, semi-desert regions similar to the Karoo.


Analysts say Shell will likely be able to conquer the technological challenge of fracking in the Karoo, but some are less certain that it can make money out of it.


To minimise the visual impact and its physical footprint, Mohale says Shell is looking to build 32 wells on each 100-metre-by-100 metre fracking "pad", compared to the six wells per pad widely used in North Dakota in the United States.


It is also adamant it will not compete with people in the Karoo for water, but can avoid trucking it in - often several thousand trips are needed per well - by drilling down to brackish aquifers as much as 4 kilometres underground, sucking up the water, cleaning it, and then using it to frack.


However, all this pumping and purifying imposes significant costs, and the 10-year outlook for global gas prices is not in Shell's favour, analysts say.


"One of the things about shale is that it is a manufacturing process. It's not an exploration and production process," said Philip Verleger, an independent U.S. energy analyst.


"It doesn't work if you have to spend huge sums of money finding water, sand or other material."

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/insight-water-wealth-whites-africas-potent-anti-fracking-101350173.html
Related Topics: edward norton   Reign   Kliff Kingsbury   diana nyad   kobe bryant  

Out Loud: Film Review




The Bottom Line


This first gay-themed drama from Lebanon is mostly interesting for its sociological repercussions.




Director-Screenwriter


Samer Daboul


Cast


Ruby Moarbes, Jad Hadid, Michel Sarkiss, Ali Rhayem, Lliane Kerdy, Jean Kobrously


 




The backstory behind the making of Out Loud is more interesting than the film itself. The filming of this Lebanese gay-themed film was vigorously opposed by members of the conservative community in which it was shot, with threats and acts of violence a constant occurrence. The film was completed only because of the intervention of military authorities, and post-production had to be done in the United States. The production travails are detailed in a companion documentary by the film’s writer/director, Samer Daboul.


It would be heartening to report that the results were worth it. But although this first gay film from the country certainly has its sociological importance, as drama it’s strictly middling. It concerns the unusual friendship among six young people, including Jason (Rudy Moarbes), still traumatized by the loss of both parents in a car bombing; Louis (Jad Hadid), devastated over his recent break-up with his girlfriend; the guitar-strumming Elvis  (Michel Sarkiss), who works for his drug-dealing father; and Rami (Ali Rhayem), whose family has recently found out that he’s gay.


Other characters figuring prominently in the story are Rami’s lover Ziad (Jean Kobrously), who’s learned firsthand the physical dangers of being outed, and Nathalie (Eliane Kerdy), a beautiful woman who stirs up complicated feelings among the group.


The film is fairly typical in its depiction of young people coping with myriad personal and societal issues, although they necessarily take on a greater significance considering the setting. But director/screenwriter Daboul fails to establish either a compelling narrative or consistent tone, with the film awkwardly lurching from comedic to melodramatic to even musical elements. With the exception of the vivacious Nathalie, played in engagingly vibrant fashion by Kerdy, the characters are too schematically rendered to make us fully care about them.


The filmmaker certainly deserves credit for having the courage to take on his controversial themes. But for all its daring, Out Loud is ultimately too muted to make much of an impact.


Opens: Friday, Oct. 25 (Ariztical Entertainment)


Production: Phoenix Eye Pictures


Cast: Ruby Moarbes, Ali Rhayem, Jad Hadid, Michel Sarkiss, Eliane Kerdy, Jad Hadid, Jean Kobrously


Director/screenwriter/producer: Samer Daboul


Executive producers: Samer Daboul, Cedric Troadec


Director of photography: Vicken Jilikian


Editor: Fares Khalil


Production designer: Gabriella El-Murr


Composer: Christopher Brady


Not rated, 102 min.


Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/thr/reviews/film/~3/D8ShuDYvVSM/loud-film-review-650612
Tags: Emily Ratajkowski   Dumb and Dumber 2   Becky G   Antoinette Tuff   brian wilson  

BoE policymakers point to UK economic improvements


LONDON (AP) — Policymakers at the Bank of England appear to be getting more optimistic over the British economy but are showing few signs of changing policy soon.

Minutes to the Oct.8-9 meeting of the Monetary Policy Committee released Wednesday show all nine policymakers voted to keep the main interest rate unchanged at the record low of 0.5 percent and not to increase the monetary stimulus.

Bank governor Mark Carney has introduced the concept of "forward guidance" on interest rates to keep the recovery on track, but the economy's improvement has prompted many in the financial markets to wonder whether interest rates may rise sooner than originally anticipated.

But policymakers say that any triggers to change in policy remain far off.

The pound fell modestly on the news to $1.6140 from $1.6165.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/boe-policymakers-point-uk-economic-improvements-090050146--finance.html
Similar Articles: When Was The First Parachute Jump?   lsu football   tesla model s   Hannah Anderson   Snowden  

iPad Air vs. MacBook Air: Which Apple portable should you get?

iPad Air vs. MacBook Air: Which Apple portable should you get?

2013 iPad buyers guide: How to choose between Apple's new iPad Air and the 2013 11-inch MacBook Air!

Apple now has two products designated as "Air", the MacBook Air, updated last June with the latest generation Intel Haswell processors, and the brand new iPad Air, introduced in October with a custom Apple A7 chipset. Both are ultra light, super thin, and incredibly long lasting, but one has a keyboard and runs OS X and the other a multitouch and iOS 7. Both can be absolutely killer on a plane, in an office, or around the house. But which one is better for you?

Models and price points

The iPad Air starts at $499 for 16GB and goes up in $100 increments for additional storage, maxing out at $799 for 128GB. For an additional $130, you can get cellular networking as well. With that, the most expensive iPad Air tops out at $929 for 128GB with Wi-Fi + cellular.

The 11-inch MacBook Air starts at $999 for a 1.3MHz Core i5, 4GB of RAM, and 128GB of storage. All three of those things can be upgraded for an additional cost. At the highest end, the most expensive MacBook Air mixes out at $1749 for 1.7GHz, 8GB, and 512GB.

Screen sizes and display densities

iPad Air vs. MacBook Air: Which Apple portable should you get?

The iPad Air ships with a 4:3 9.7-inch 2048x1536 Retina display at 264ppi. That's the largest iOS display Apple currently ships, though it's not quite as dense as the Retina iPad mini or iPhone 5 series. The panel is LED backlit and boasts in-plane switching (IPS) technology for improved viewing angles.

The 11-inch MacBook Air has a 16:9 11.6-inch 1366x768 standard display at 135ppi. Unlike the MacBook Pro, Apple hasn't (yet) brought Retina display to the MacBook Air line. The panel is LED but not IPS.

While the 11-inch MacBook Air has the bigger display (by almost 2-inches diagonally), the iPad Air has a much better and more advanced display.

Processor power and battery life

Everything you need to know about Apple's all-new 64-bit A7 system-on-a-chip, and the next generation Cyclone processor

The iPad Air has an Apple A7 chipset, which includes both a custom 64-bit ARMv8-based Cyclone CPU, a PowerVR Series 6 "Rogue" GPU, and an Apple M7 motion coprocessor. Apple lists it as having up to 10 hours of wireless web use or video playback.

The 11-inch MacBook Air has an Intel Core i5 "Haswell" processor with integrated Intel HD Graphics 5000. Apple lists it as having up to 9 hours of wireless web use, 8 ours of iTunes video playback, and up to 30 days of standby battery life.

The iPad Air has one hell of a processor for a mobile device - desktop class, even - but it's still a mobile processor. The MacBook Air has a full on desktop processor, though one geared for portability rather than power. Despite the MacBook's battery optimizations, however, the iPad beats it by an hour or more on battery life.

Input methods

The iPad Air has a multitouch display that's used for direct manipulation. You can tap, swipe, pinch, and otherwise gesture your way though the entire operating system, and all of its apps. For text input, it has a virtual keyboard with character prediction and autocorrect. The iPad can also connect to physical keyboards (sold separately) over Bluetooth.

The 11-inch MacBook Air doesn't have a touch screen but does have a full-sized physical keyboard and a large, multitouch trackpad that allows for all sorts of iOS-style gesture manipulations.

With a keyboard, depending on the size of the keyboard, the iPad Air can handle text entry every bit as well as the 11-inch MacBook Air. The MacBook Air multitouch trackpad can do much of what the iPad's screen can do, but doesn't offer the same kind of direct - finger on object - manipulation as the iPad.

Ports and expansion

The iPad mini has a Lightning connector. With it, the iPad can use adapters (sold separately) to interface with non-powered USB devices, principally cameras, and SD cards, principally to retrieve photos. It can also connect to VGA and HDMI displays, and iPad-specific accessories for video, music, and more. The iPad cannot connect to storage expansion peripherals.

The 11-inch MacBook Air has two USB 3 ports, a Thunderbolt port, and an SD card slot. With them, and the appropriate cables (sold separately), it can interface with most standard computer accessories and peripherals, including displays and external storage devices.

Although both the iPad Air and the MacBook Air are basically hermetically sealed computing appliances, the MacBook is vastly more extensible than the iPad.

Operating systems

The iPad mini ships with iOS 7, Apple's mobile operating system. It's a single user, full screen operating system with no user-visible file system, and no access to system-level functionality. It is, however, incredibly easy to use, requires little or no maintenance, and can be used to its full potential by almost any mainstream person.

The 11-inch MacBook Air runs Apple's laptop and desktop operating system. It's a multi-user, multi-window operating system the combines all the power of a traditional UNIX 3 environment with a full-on graphical user interface, and even an iOS-like launcher layer. It's not as accessible to the mainstream, but it's more functional for those familiar with computers.

iOS 7 holds to the principle of less is more. You can't do as much with it in theory, but more people can do more with it than they can with more complicated systems like OS X. The different approaches will appeal to decidedly different types of people.

Software and services

Everything you need to know about Apple's fifth-generation iPad Air, with new design and Apple A7 processor

The iPad Air has access to the iOS App Store which boasts over one million apps, almost half of which are now optimized to run on its bigger screen. It includes apps in all categories, from games to productivity, communications to entertainment. Most of them are free or extremely cheap. The iPad can also run HTML5 web apps, but can't download or run apps from internet locations or any app store other than Apple's.

The 11-inch MacBook Air has the Mac App Store, which works similarly to the iOS App Store and provides secure access to all kinds of games, productivity, communications, and entertainment apps. Macs can also run HTML5 web apps, as well as apps downloaded from the web or other app stores. This includes desktop-class apps unavailable to iOS, like Final Cut Pro X, Microsoft Office, Adobe Creative Cloud, and many more.

The iPad and iOS have an incredibly quantity and diversity of apps, at incredibly cheap (or even free) prices. The MacBook and OS X, however, have apps simply unavailable on iOS. Both have access to iCloud, Dropbox, SkyDrive, Google, and other popular online services. OS X, however, can typically integrate more deeply and more flexibly with those services.

Who should get the iPad Air?

The iPad Air is best suited for people for whom traditional computers have always been inaccessible, intimidating, or otherwise off-putting. While the MacBook Air is inarguably more powerful, the iPad Air can empower more people to get more out of it, thanks to the directness of its interface and simplicity of its operations. If sitting in front of a keyboard and mouse ever made you feel lost, you should get the iPad Air.

The iPad Air is also ideally suited for people who want the absolute lightest computing experience possible for use around the house or while traveling. For everything from gaming to working (especially with a hardware keyboard accessory) it can accomplish everything but the most intense computing tasks, in the most highly portable form factor yet devised. If any laptop, no matter how small, is too much, the iPad Air is for you.

(If even the iPad Air is too much, consider the lighter, smaller 7.9-inch Retina iPad mini.)

Who should get the 11-inch MacBook Air?

The MacBook Air is best suited for people who are used to and require a traditional computing experience. From advanced keyboard shortcuts to drag-and-drop workflows, to multiple users, to Terminal, to... you get the idea. It's everything you need in a Unix box and modern GUI in the best blend of portability and power currently on the market. If you need to run Photoshop, Pro Tools, Xcode, or other high-end software on the go, you need a MacBook Air.

The MacBook Air is also great for people who want a Mac they can hook up to a big 27-inch Thunderbolt display at work or at home, and still slip into a tiny messenger bag or backpack and take on the road, or into the skies. Thanks to its ports, it can also be hooked into most networks, and most storage, on the market, making it a useable workstation when it needs to me. If you absolutely have to have a laptop, but you want the most minimal laptop possible, look into a MacBook Air.

(If the 11-inch MacBook Air isn't quite enough for you, look into the slightly bigger and more powerful 13-inch MacBook Air, or even the considerably more powerful 13-inch MacBook Pro)

Still undecided?

Some people are mobile first and just want an iPad. Others are computer-first and need a laptop. Still others split the difference and get either an iPad mini and a MacBook, or an iPad Air and an iMac. The great thing about options is that you can find the perfect device, or pair of devices, that best suit your individual needs.

If you're still having trouble choosing between an iPad and a MacBook, jump into our iPad discussion forums or Mac discussion forums and the best community in mobile will happily help you out.


    






Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/kTE_rdbE8F0/story01.htm
Similar Articles: Kliff Kingsbury   djokovic   Kendrick Lamar diss  

LinkedIn defends Intro security

LinkedIn defends Intro security

Last week professional networking service LinkedIn introduced a new service called Intro, which works on your iPhone and in conjunction with your e-mail account to provide you with instant details about the people you're communicating with, linking to their LinkedIn profiles. In fact, it reroutes your mail account through LinkedIn's own systems. That's raised red flags as a potential security problem. Now LinkedIn is taking to the Internet to allay fears that Intro users are at risk.

Cory Scott, LinkedIn's senior manager of Information Security, has made a blog post explaining how Intro works.

From network hardening and isolation to bringing in a third-party security consulting firm, Scott says that LinkedIn does whatever it can to make sure that Intro is secure.

When mail flows through the LinkedIn Intro service, we make sure we never persist the mail contents to our systems in an unencrypted form. And once the user has retrieved the mail, the encrypted content is deleted from our systems.

Scott calls the negative comments made thus far "misconceptions" and "purely speculative." But is that enough? What do you think? Are you nervous about Intro's security? Or have you already starting using it? Please let me know in the comments.


    






Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/MdHnAZk2T4w/story01.htm
Category: Texas A&m   EBT   Covered California   Mr Cee   The Butler